[This review was originally posted at the Nieman Journalism Lab Glucophage Cost, on July 13, 2012.]

Evaluating newspapers' various strategies: Several wide-ranging strategies in the newspaper industry have been making headlines lately (Newhouse's draconian cuts in New Orleans, Warren Buffett's aggressive newspaper purchases, outsourcing hyperlocal news to Journatic), and The New York Times' David Carr tied a lot of them together in a sharp column identifying the severe financial difficulties facing the newspaper industry. The piece of news he reported was the fact that pension funds at major newspaper chains like Gannett and McClatchy are underfunded by hundreds of millions of dollars. Gannett Blog's Jim Hopkins said that finding deserves some attention.

One of the most prominent responses to these financial threats has been the implementation of online paywalls, a strategy that eByline's Peter Beller reported is more common at larger papers, to the point where it now affects a third of America's daily newspaper readers, buy Glucophage online no prescription. Closely tied to that strategy is a doubling-down by publishers on "original reporting" online, which media analyst Frederic Filloux contended is a losing proposition, because aggregators' tech- and marketing-savviness are trumping the quality of traditional publishers' work in the battle for online readers. British journalist Adam Tinworth said part of the problem is that publishers are trying out and pitching new digital strategies far too often, instead of being patient enough to see one through, Glucophage Cost.

Here at the Lab, Where can i find Glucophage online, Ken Doctor responded to all the hand-wringing with a list of reasons for hope in the news industry, including the potential in digital circulation, the growth of tablets, community blogs, and customer data.

Elsewhere, where can i order Glucophage without prescription, media analyst Alan Mutter categorized three strategies for newspapers dealing with the new digital environment — keeping up the status quo as long as possible ("farming" it), accepting print's decline and extracting as much money as possible before it finally goes ("milking" it), and leveraging old media resources to aggressively invest in digital innovation ("feeding" it). He mapped a different publisher to each approach — Buffett to farming, Online buying Glucophage, Newhouse to milking, and Rupert Murdoch to feeding — and ultimately endorsed Murdoch's plan.

Peter Kirwan of The Media Briefing also praised Murdoch's efforts to turn up the pressure on his print properties to start making money through digital innovation: Some of the experiments might backfire, he said, but "whatever it takes, speeding up the pace of digital transition can only be a good thing."

—

Newhouse's detractors and defenders: One of those newspapers has drawn particular attention over the past month or so — the New Orleans Times-Picayune, buy Glucophage from canada, which has now undergone its drastic layoffs and plans to cut down its publishing three days a week this October. Glucophage Cost, This week, the Newhouse family, which owns the paper, rejected a request by several New Orleans bigwigs to sell the paper to an unnamed buyer whom they have reportedly lined up. One local court also moved its public notices from the TP to the weekly paper the Gambit, and the paper is also receiving rants from its reporters about its poor website.

Newhouse's moves continue to draw strong criticism from media observers, Online buy Glucophage without a prescription, including former newspaper editor John L. Robinson, who attributed the changes to the fundamental conflict between public service and profits. "Profit trumps readers every time. The owners may appreciate the public service journalism the paper may produce, but it isn’t what they value the most," he wrote. And former Baltimore Sun reporter and "The Wire" creator David Simon argued in the Gambit that what's being lost in newspapers' evisceration is the public accountability provided by beat reporting, Glucophage from mexico.

But Newhouse has its defenders, too, including Digital First CEO John Paton, who argued that while the company is handling the transition poorly, it's still making the type of difficult, digitally centered change that's necessary for the business to survive, Glucophage Cost. GigaOM's Mathew Ingram concurred. Rem Rieder of the American Journalism Review acknowledged that arduous change is necessary for newspapers, but said the clumsiness with which Newhouse has handled its moves in New Orleans has swallowed up its goodwill and set the cause of change back.

—

Two studies with good news for mobile news: Two studies with interesting implications for digital news were released this week, Glucophage class, one on mobile news consumption and the other an international study on digital and mobile news consumption. The first, conducted by the Reynolds Journalism Institute, found that users of large tablets (i.e. Glucophage Cost, iPads and the like, rather than Kindle Fires) were older, more likely to pay for digital news, and particularly enjoyed reading on the tablet compared with other media. Poynter's Jeff Sonderman noted that those results makes "tablet readers seem the best hope for print publishers that want to make a digital transition based on paid content."

Slate's Will Oremus echoed that idea, though he cautioned that tablets may do more to eat into evening news' audience than help the traditional publishing industry, Glucophage without a prescription. This study was the final part of a three-part study on mobile media, and Amy Gahran of the Knight Digital Media Center gave some suggestions for future mobile news research, including focusing on community news in particular.

The second study, Ordering Glucophage online,  issued by Oxford's Reuters Institute, looked at digital news use in the U.S. and four European countries, with findings focusing on the rise of smartphones and tablets, as well as young people's changing news consumption habits. PaidContent's Robert Andrews highlighted the increasing willingness to pay for news among young smartphone and tablet owners, Glucophage Cost. J-prof Alfred Hermida dug into the numbers and pointed out that while the use of social media for news is up sharply, Glucophage for sale, it's driven by a small core of heavy news sharers.

—

Does outsourcing have a place in local news?: Last week's controversy regarding fake bylines at the hyperlocal content provider Journatic continued to generate debate this week, especially for newspaper columnists who defended the value of locally produced news (such as, say, Glucophage reviews, the news that appears in their newspaper). WNPR public radio hosted a discussion on outsourcing local news, and while former Patch editor-in-chief Brian Farnham didn't defend Journatic (he said it "gives me a cheap feeling"), he did say the overwhelming nitpicking and self-criticism coming from within journalism makes it difficult for any digital journalism initiative to survive.

Danish j-prof Rasmus Kleis Nielsen argued that with news' business model collapsing, the question isn't whether some aspects should be outsourced, cheap Glucophage no rx, but what and when. Glucophage Cost, If this episode illustrates that the article is untouchable, though, the scale of news production is going to have to decline, he said. "Cottage production works for the few, I don’t see how it will work for the many."

—

Reading roundup: No big stories this week, but lots of smaller ones to keep up with:

— Some continued discussion about CNN's (and others') Supreme Court reporting fiasco: The New Republic's Amy Sullivan urged journalists to stop caring about scoops, and reporters responded by defending the importance of speed in news. Sullivan replied that it's not really about speed per se, but obsession with being first with information that will become widely distributed almost immediately anyway. Poynter's Craig Silverman pulled some lessons for newsrooms from the fiasco. Buy cheap Glucophage, — Next Issue Media, a digital media joint venture among several top media companies, issued its iPad edition, which allows subscribers to read all they want of 39 magazines for a flat monthly fee — what Shawn King of The Loop and others called the Netflix model for magazines. Time's Harry McCracken said its audience will probably be limited to print magazine junkies, and GigaOM's Mathew Ingram was skeptical of the plan as a way to emulate print reading experiences, Glucophage long term.

— A group of media moguls met this week in California to talk about a variety of issues, one of which was the defeat this winter of their SOPA/PIPA anti-piracy laws. The New York Times and Forbes have more details about how that fight between media and tech is progressing, and Bloomberg broke down some of the other issues the executives would be discussing.

— The New York Observer's Kat Stoeffel reported that News Corp.'s money-losing tablet news publication, The Daily, has been placed "on watch," to be evaluated (and possibly killed) after November's election. Business Insider's Henry Blodget said The Daily has failed because it failed to carve out a niche or a distinct perspective.

— A few thought-provoking pieces that deserve a read this week: Two from the Columbia Journalism Review on making freelancing sustainable in the digital world and on the battle over the network nightly newscasts, and one here at the Lab by Jonathan Stray on getting ourselves out of like-minded "filter bubbles" in our online information consumption.

Similar posts: Lipitor Cost. Cephalexin No Rx. Buy Retin A No Prescription. Armour results. Synthroid price, coupon. Armour price, coupon.
Trackbacks from: Glucophage Cost. Glucophage Cost. Glucophage Cost. Glucophage trusted pharmacy reviews. Glucophage canada, mexico, india. After Glucophage.

[This review was originally posted at the Nieman Journalism Lab Cephalexin Price, on Aug. 19, 2011.]

Is social media killing big ideas?: In the New York Times this week, USC fellow Neal Gabler put forward a different form of the familiar "information overload" complaint, this time tying the proliferation of social media to the paucity of big ideas. We don't spend time thinking about and valuing big ideas, Cephalexin from canada, he argued, because we're too busy trying to process — and add to — the flood of information coming at us through social media. You can't think and tweet at the same time, Gabler said, because tweeting "is a form of distraction or anti-thinking."

Naturally, this didn't go over particularly well among the online media punditry. Several people countered that one of Twitter's functions is to direct users to big ideas, no prescription Cephalexin online, to point outside of its 140-character limits through hyperlinks. Media prof Chuck Tryon, author Stephen Baker, and Techdirt's Mike Masnick all made that argument, with Masnick summing it up well: "While social media may not have enlarged Gabler's intellectual universe, it has massively enlarged mine, Cephalexin Price. Thanks to Twitter specifically, I've been able to meet tons of fascinatingly smart people I never would have met otherwise." The trick, as Baker said, is to "listen to the right people, Cephalexin interactions, and then follow their links."

Two other writers made particularly smart points: Kevin Drum of Mother Jones noted that where before we knew exactly where to find big ideas and how to discuss them, we're now in the middle of a massive media transition. That doesn't mean the big idea is dead, he said, it means it's headed somewhere new, and we don't know exactly where yet. And the Lab's Megan Garber pointed out that Gabler's vision of big ideas is closely tied to big media, buy Cephalexin online cod, but argued that those big ideas don't need big media to thrive. Instead, she said, "Increasingly, though, Cephalexin australia, uk, us, usa, the ideas that spark progress are collective, diffusive endeavors rather than the result (to the extent they ever were) of individual inspiration."

—

A paywall plan that understands online readers?: Reuters blogger Felix Salmon is already on record as a supporter of the New York Times' five-month-old paywall, and this week he detailed exactly why he thinks it's so effective. Cephalexin Price, Salmon likened the Times' metered model, with all of its leeway and potential workarounds, to a polite "Please keep off the grass" sign. He argued that contra the prevailing philosophy that readers won't pay for something they can get for free, the Times is betting that "the pleasure of reading its content will be enough to persuade a large number of people to pay. It’s a far more attractive model, and one which is much more likely to attract new young subscribers over the long term."

In a follow-up post, buy cheap Cephalexin, Salmon explained why the Times' model is fundamentally different from the Financial Times' pay meter — it's not trying nearly as hard to keep non-subscribers away from its content. Venture capitalist Fred Wilson and Poynter's Jeff Sonderman agreed with Salmon's premise: Wilson praised the efficacy of getting paid after the fact rather than before, and Sonderman said the Times has discovered that convenience, duty, and appreciation are more compelling motivations than coercion. Cephalexin over the counter, There was one notable dissenter: GigaOM's Mathew Ingram, who took issue with the idea that the Times' plan has been successful, arguing instead that it's not growing the paper's online audience, but setting up digital sandbags to protect a declining print product. The plan "has virtually nothing to do with actually taking advantage of the digital world in any concrete way," Ingram wrote, Cephalexin Price. "It’s just charging people nickels and dimes for their paper, the way the NYT and other newspapers have for a century and a half or so."

—

News Corp.'s problems continue to grow: The damning information against News Corp. in the phone-hacking scandal at its former News of the World newspaper keeps on coming, Cephalexin no rx. This week, it was a four-year-old letter written by Clive Goodman, a reporter at the center of the scandal. In it, Goodman said that the hacking was discussed regularly at the paper and suggested that knowledge of it ran much deeper than News Corp. Cephalexin Price, has been insisting. Ordering Cephalexin online, Notably, News Corp. had submitted the letter to Parliament but redacted the incriminating parts.

With the new revelation, Slate's Jack Shafer wrote that "the scandal has grown too large for one or two willing Murdoch lieutenants or employees to stanch it by taking the fall." That impression has led many watchers to wonder, as the Guardian's Brian Cathcart did, if James Murdoch, Cephalexin recreational, Rupert's son, may be forced to resign. James responded late last week to Parliament's questions about his truthfulness in his testimony to them last month, and News Corp. is reportedly making plans in case he decides to step aside, Cephalexin Price.

The bad news continues to pile up elsewhere in News Corp., Cephalexin photos, too. The private investigator at the center of the scandal sued News International (the company's British newspaper division) for not paying his legal bills, and officially acknowledged in its annual report that the scandal could impair its business, and that it doesn't know how much money it'll end up costing. Two more commentators — the New Yorker's Ken Auletta and Reuters' David Callahan — echoed a popular sentiment lately, saying the responsibility for this whole ordeal lies directly with Rupert Murdoch.

—

Google grabs a mobile-phone producer: For the tech geeks among us, buy Cephalexin online no prescription, Google made some big news this week, buying Motorola Mobility, Motorola's mobile devices division, for $12.5 billion. According to the New York Times Cephalexin Price, , the deal had a lot to do with stockpiling patents in order to defend its Android mobile operating system from patent lawsuits. It also may allow Google to drive down development costs for the all-important smartphone and tablet markets. Order Cephalexin online c.o.d, Cory Bergman of Lost Remote noted that this move isn't just about mobile, though — it also represents Google's biggest move into TV yet. With Motorola's significant share of the cable-TV hardware business, Bergman said, Google now has the opportunity to seamlessly integrate its technology with TVs across the world.

Here at the Lab, Joshua Benton used the acquisition as an example of the tension between a Windows-style modular approach to business, buy Cephalexin without a prescription, with products that can be swapped in and out, and an Apple-esque interdependent one, with a set of interlinking, proprietary products. He also applied the idea to news, saying our journalistic ecosystem needs both the more open modular approach and the more packaged interdependent approach, Cephalexin Price.

A couple of other posts looked at the story of the deal itself: Reuters' Felix Salmon examined the decline (and declining value) of the financial scoops beat, Cephalexin schedule, and Gawker's Ryan Tate saw Google's manufactured press-release quotes by its business partners as a sign that Google is moving away from the "Don't Be Evil" mantra toward being a tight-fisted corporate giant.

—

Reading roundup: This week was a pretty packed one. Here's the best of the rest:

— This week in AOL: The New York Times' Verne Kopytoff analyzed why the new-look AOL has experienced so many hiccups, and j-prof Dan Kennedy seized on the tidbit in that article that AOL would reportedly be profitable without Patch.

— Web philosopher David Weinberger wrote a fantastic piece about the journalistic curiosity and community exchange that's present at Reddit, and GigaOM's Mathew Ingram echoed his thoughts.

— The Knight Digital Media Center's Joy Mayer has apparently become journalism's "Minister of Engagement," and she's earned the title, publishing a thorough guide to community engagement for newsrooms.

— The Online Journalism Review's Robert Niles wondered what journalism is worth, and came up with some depressing answers.

— Finally, since classes are starting up all over the place in the next week or two, here's 10 great tips for journalism students from Sarah Marshall of Journalism.co.uk, via Twitter.

Similar posts: Purchase Synthroid. Synthroid Cost. Lipitor No Rx. Glucophage from canadian pharmacy. Where can i buy cheapest Flagyl online. Glucophage photos.
Trackbacks from: Cephalexin Price. Cephalexin Price. Cephalexin Price. Purchase Cephalexin online. Cephalexin from mexico. Buy Cephalexin online cod.

[This review was originally posted at the Nieman Journalism Lab Synthroid For Sale, on Dec. 3, 2010.]

We're covering two weeks instead of the usual one in this review, so there's a ton to pack in here. I'll try to zip through it a little more quickly than usual.

What to make of WikiLeaks: WikiLeaks made its third big document drop since this summer this week, releasing about 250,000 confidential diplomatic cables. Here's coverage by The New York Times, Synthroid duration,  The Guardian, Der Spiegel, and a roundup by The Columbia Journalism Review. Time talked to WikiLeaks' Julian Assange about the leak, and Forbes published an interview and long piece about Assange's next target — corporate America, Synthroid For Sale.

As for the leak itself, The Guardian detailed the documents' path from the alleged leaker, U.S. soldier Bradley Manning, to Assange, to a Guardian reporter. Yahoo's Michael Calderone looked at The Times' editorial process with the cables, purchase Synthroid for sale, including the revelation that they got them from The Guardian, not WikiLeaks. The Wall Street Journal and CNN both declined to sign agreements with WikiLeaks to see the documents in advance, and The Journal examined news orgs' decisions on whether or not to publish. The Times explained its own publishing decision, then (quite eloquently) responded to readers' objections. Synthroid For Sale, The reaction against WikiLeaks was quicker and harsher than those following each of its last two leaks. Before the documents were released, its site was hacked, the U.S. Purchase Synthroid online no prescription, and British governments issued pre-emptive condemnations, and senators called for WikiLeaks to be prosecuted. After the release, the Obama administration said it was indeed pursuing a criminal investigation, Interpol revealed it has put out a call for Assange's arrest (ostensibly for his rape accusations), and Amazon booted WikiLeaks from its servers under pressure from U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman, Synthroid For Sale.

WikiLeaks' actions left many journalists and media observers divided: An Economist blogger accused WikiLeaks of degenerating into gossip, and even Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger called them enemies of the American people. Assange and WikiLeaks had their defenders, purchase Synthroid, too: Slate's Jack Shafer praised them for puncturing "the prerogative of secrecy," and another Economist blogger made a similar argument. The Guardian's Simon Jenkins noted that "the job of the media is not to protect power from embarrassment." Meanwhile, Northeastern j-prof Dan Kennedy wrestled with the balance between transparency and secrecy.

Others' primary concern was not value judgments, but classification. Is WikiLeaks  Synthroid For Sale, espionage. Journalism? Radically open government? Or, as CUNY j-prof C.W. Purchase Synthroid online, Anderson argued, is it a facilitator of real-time history documentation. NYU j-prof Jay Rosen hashed out his thoughts on WikiLeaks as a stateless news organization on video, concluding, "The watchdog press died, and what we have is WikiLeaks instead." Paul Balcerak wondered why WikiLeaks gets so much more attention than the press's own reporting.

If you really want to spend the weekend pondering the meaning of WikiLeaks, it's best to start with two posts: Some incisive questions by Salon's Dan Gillmor, and a brilliant post by Aaron Bady sifting through Assange's own words to determine his motivations behind WikiLeaks' radical transparency.

—

Rupert's big tablet splash: We've heard bits and pieces about Rupert Murdoch's planned tablet-based national news publication, but we got the first substantive report on the subject two weeks ago from Women's Wear Daily, Synthroid For Sale. Among the key details: It's going by The Daily, Synthroid price, coupon, it has a staff of 100, it'll cost 99 cents a week, and it'll come out once a day. The New York Observer gave us some more information about the publication's design (it's text-first and will be published overnight, but apparently looks pretty cool). Other tidbits: John Gruber at Daring Fireball heard that it'll pioneer a new app subscription API from Apple, and New York's Gabriel Snyder said it will have a centrist editorial outlook.

The reasons why this project is getting so much pre-launch attention seem pretty readily evident: Murdoch, Synthroid mg, original tablet news org, iPad news subscriptions, you know the rest. As The Columbia Journalism Review noted Synthroid For Sale, , what's new about this publication is that it won't even have a website. The initial response from the media-watching world was predominantly negative, with skepticism coming from The New York Times' David Carr, Gawker's Ryan Tate, Scott Rosenberg, Sam Diaz of ZDNet, GigaOM's Mathew Ingram, Fast Company's Kit Eaton, comprar en línea Synthroid, comprar Synthroid baratos, The Guardian's Emily Bell, and paidContent's Andrew Wallenstein.

Many of those critics made similar points, so here's a roundup of the main ones: 1) It's trying to impose slow print-think onto the speed-oriented world of mobile media (this is Rosenberg's main point); 2) The fact that it won't have inbound or outbound links means it can't share in the virality that makes news on the Web work; 3) The folks on board don't exactly seem like the tech revolutionaries they might need to be (Wallenstein's main point); and 4) How many people are actually going to pay for this, and can it really cover The Daily's costs. (Carr's main objection)

Several of those people also noted a few factors in Murdoch's favor: Carr argued that people will be more likely to pay for news in an app world than on the web, and both Tate and Eaton noted that Apple's Steve Jobs (who is reported to be tied to the project) is a pretty powerful guy with a history of success in ventures like these. We got a few good suggestions for Murdoch's project, Doses Synthroid work, too: TechCrunch's Erick Schonfeld said to make it local, real-time, and social; Frederic Filloux wanted it speedy, simple, beyond Apple, and with adjustable pricing; and at paidContent, Nic Newman wanted to see a mixture of free and paid content.

—

Designing apps for tablets and mobile media: Murdoch isn't the only one with a big new tablet app to unveil: Yahoo's Joe Pompeo summarized two others — mini-magazines called Nomad Editions and a new iPad magazine by Virgin called Project, Synthroid For Sale. Of those, Project, announced Tuesday, ordering Synthroid online, got a bit more attention. PaidContent had some details about its video cover and "living magazine" mindset, and All Things Digital's Peter Kafka pointed out the magazine's rather intimidating instruction page, though David Carr told NPR it's still pretty magazine-like.

Also in the process of launching: Next Issue Media, a joint venture by several magazine magnates, will launch its digital newsstand early next year and gave some details to MediaWeek, and Swedish publisher Bonnier, Synthroid photos, whose Mag+ everyone loved, is expanding into News+. Meanwhile, the Financial Times' iPad app is doing well, but The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh remained skeptical that most newspapers' iPad apps will be able to stand out among the sea of more enjoyable apps.

A couple more smart thoughts on mobile media: PaidContent founder Rafat Ali talked about Synthroid For Sale, designing for touchscreens, and Poynter's Damon Kiesow argued that smartphones are fundamentally a mobile device, while the iPad is a leisure device, so their apps can't be imposed onto each other: "To fully serve and engage an audience, an app needs to target one distinctive strength — either location or leisure — and make the content and experience fit that use."

—

Gawker grows beyond the blog: In advance of its coming overhaul early next year, Gawker head Nick Denton wrote a manifesto explaining why the network of sites is going beyond the blog format (his post at the previous link is in the sites' new design). Denton said he's discovered the new formula for online media success: Not so much Gawker's former trademark snarky meta-analysis, but a few huge juicy scoops accompanied by a steady stream of aggregation, all with a visual bent. He extended the model to include advertising and branding as well.

Reuters' Felix Salmon responded with a meticulous analysis of Gawker's new direction, Synthroid description, noting that while Denton was the first person to make blogging into "a large-scale commercial venture," he's now aggressively dumping blogging's defining reverse-chronological format. Ron Mwangaguhunga of eMedia Vitals compared Gawker's new model with a TV business model, and Anil Dash said that while Gawker is still a blog, it's borrowing Twitter's design that emphasizes both content and the stream of news. "By allowing that flow to continue regardless of which particular piece of embedded content has caught your eye, Gawker and Twitter are just showing the vibrancy and resilience of the format."

—

Why Twitter matters: Speaking of Twitter, Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger offered a stirring defense of Twitter's meaning for journalism as part of a lecture on the state of the Fourth Estate. His list of 15 reasons Twitter matters covers most everything: Reporting, conversation, aggregation, search, marketing, authority, writing, Synthroid For Sale. Likewise, Synthroid street price, GigaOM's Mathew Ingram argued that Twitter's real cultural power "could well be that it is the simplest, the easiest and arguably one of the most efficient forms of mass publishing — or at least micro-publishing — ever invented."

Later, Ingram took Twitter co-founder Biz Stone's apparently off-the-cuff statement that Twitter could develop a news network as an opportunity to think about how news orgs could filter Twitter into a usable crowdsourced newswire. And MediaBistro talked with Canada's National Post to get a sense of how one major newspaper uses Twitter.

—

Business-model developments and discussion: A few notes on the ever-evolving paid-content front: At least two more news organizations are using the Press+ system of Steve Brill's Journalism Online for their online revenue goals — ProPublica, which is using it to solicit donations online, and Oklahoma State's Daily O'Collegian, which will charge outside-the-area readers. Over at The Guardian, Cory Doctorow examined The Times of London's paywall numbers, and CrunchGear's Devin Coldewey thought out loud about a possible online paid-content system, order Synthroid from United States pharmacy.

Meanwhile, British journalist Kevin Anderson wrote a post arguing that value-added journalism has to be developed with specific revenue streams in mind. Howard Owens of The Batavian countered Synthroid For Sale, that would-be entrepreneurial journalists need to focus more on basic local events journalism than "adding value" or analytical journalism, and TBD's Steve Buttry tried to bring the two perspectives together.

—

Reading roundup: Here's what else you should see this week, in the quickest-hit form I can give it to you:

— A British court upheld a stipulation that news organizations can charge paid online news monitoring agencies for using their content. The Telegraph, TechCrunch Europe, and the Press Gazette explain why it's bad news for aggregators.

— No less an authority than World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee joined the chorus of people extolling the value of data journalism during a panel. A somewhat related debate broke out when Mark Luckie opined on the myths about digital journalism skills. Discount Synthroid, Journalist Andy Boyle disputed Luckie's claims about what new-media skills journalists need (and don't need) to know, and j-prof Mindy McAdams and journalist Brian Manzullo chimed in. Anthony DeBarros and Robert Hernandez turned the discussion toward data journalism, with Hernandez asserting that programming doesn't replace the story. That got Michelle Minkoff kind of riled up, Synthroid For Sale.

— The New York Times ran an article looking at the ways technology is creating increased distractions for young people, which was met by smart rebuttals by Duke prof Cathy Davidson and the Lab's own Megan Garber.

— Also at the Lab: USC prof Henry Jenkins on his concept of "spreadable" media.

— Mashable's Vadim Lavrusik wrote a great roundup of what's going on at the intersection of investigative journalism and social media.

— Finally, if you're looking for a single document to answer the question, "How should newspapers adapt to this new media environment?" you can't do much better than John Paton's presentation on how he's turned around the Journal Register Co. It's brilliant.

Similar posts: Cipro Price. Armour Dosage. Purchase Synthroid. Japan, craiglist, ebay, overseas, paypal. Buy Glucophage from mexico. Flagyl without prescription.
Trackbacks from: Synthroid For Sale. Synthroid For Sale. Synthroid For Sale. Buy generic Synthroid. Synthroid australia, uk, us, usa. Get Synthroid.

Les Moonves Armour Price, , president of CBS Corp., was in Austin on Monday to receive an award from the University of Texas and give a lecture called "The Networks Strike Back: How Old Media Has Adapted to the New World." It was exactly what you'd guess from the title: A full-throated defense of the broadcast networks' vitality in a media landscape where new media companies like Google, Apple, Amazon and Netflix are making most of the headlines and shaping most of the media consumption.

Moonves' talk could have been subtitled: "It's still the content, stupid." His argument was simple: All these devices and platforms may be changing the way we consume media, but they're not changing the content we consume on that media. Well-produced, buy no prescription Armour online, high-quality content will win out on any platform, and the deep-pocketed networks (CBS in particular, of course) are still the ones producing that "professional content" without which the new-media innovations wouldn't have any real value. Armour over the counter, Moonves was unshakably optimistic — he didn't give the curmudgeon's dismissal of the Internet; he simply described it as just another medium for the existing media powers like his own company to colonize and extend their brands.

Before his talk, Moonves took some questions from 15 or so UT grad students (I was one) and gave a few more candid applications of his philosophy — you might call it a sort of new media Manifest Destiny — to various areas. Here are a few of the choice quotes, Armour Price.

"No matter how they share it, they have to come to us for our content, Armour natural. And we're going to get paid properly for it, or else we're not going to do it."

This was in response to a question about what CBS was doing to put their content on mobile devices. This is the issue of the day at CBS, Buy cheap Armour no rx, Moonves said, though the company is comfortable in taking it at their own pace.

Moonves spoke about the Googles, Apples and Amazons of the world with what I saw a sort of veiled condescension — he repeatedly referred to their executives as "geniuses" who were changing the way the world consumes media, but without quality content, fast shipping Armour, he said, their technologies are just blank screens. Armour Price, And because Moonves sees CBS' content as holding so much value, he's fine with withholding that content from a platform until he feels it gets the money it's worth.

The second part of that quote is a common sentiment among media executives these days, Armour from canada, but you usually see it followed with something to the effect of, "...and that's why we're going to begin charging for all of our online content, starting in 2011..." But when it was brought up later, Moonves was pretty cool to the idea of a paywall for news (he was never directly asked about it, but said he doesn't believe anybody would pay for CBS News' content online because they can get it for free elsewhere), order Armour no prescription.

So Moonves is pretty picky about getting paid for CBS' content, but he's also picky about what content he'll charge for and where. CBS is the only network that doesn't put its videos on Hulu, After Armour, because Moonves wants to be free to use them elsewhere, too. As for Apple's world of products ...

"Let's see how your experiment goes, and my guess is if we want to join in January, you'll take our content."

This was Moonves' characterization of his conversation with Apple's Steve Jobs' (or, more precisely, Jobs' people — he said he's only talked to Steve about paid content once) about Apple's new 99-cent TV show rental plan through iTunes, Armour Price.

Moonves seems to have no problem taking a wait-and-see approach with new content forms and pricing plans: Watch others experiment, and if it looks successful, where can i buy Armour online, jump on it. He made it clear that CBS does want to be involved in this stuff — it's just going to do it on its own terms, because as Moonves sees it, Canada, mexico, india, CBS holds all the cards as a provider of valuable content. As he said in his lecture, "The guys who produce the best content, the best programming, are in the driver's seat."

"It has to change, kjøpe Armour på nett, köpa Armour online. Otherwise, it will go down."

Moonves on the half-hour evening newscast. Armour Price, CBS will always produce a nightly evening newscast, Moonves said, as it's "part of our agreement with the American people that we will do that." But he sees the form of that newscast changing radically — and probably soon.

He tossed out the idea of turning the evening news into more of a Nightline-style in-depth examination of one or two issues, Armour photos, or an extended discussion a la Face the Nation.

Some of the reason for those changes is the fact that by the time people get home in the evening, they already know the day's news, Moonves said. But another key factor is cost, what is Armour. Moonves said repeatedly that the model of maintaining costly foreign bureaus and a sizable reporting staff primarily to feed only a half-hour daily news show isn't a good one, and CBS hasn't been doing it as well since its extensive cuts over the past several years. A nightly show based on fewer issues or commentary would be much cheaper — though an often-discussed merger with CNN (which Moonves referenced without going into specifics) would change those economics quite a bit, too, Armour Price.

"The Katie Couric deal will be the last big deal of that kind ever done. Armour gel, ointment, cream, pill, spray, continuous-release, extended-release, ... Those days are over, because the news no longer generates the kind of revenue or success that's worth doing [those contracts]."

Another way to cut costs: Don't sign marquee anchors to eight-figure annual salaries. Not only was Moonves he won't do that again, but he was asserting that no one will do that again, Armour use. Armour Price, Why.

"We thought it would make a difference. It didn't."

Oh. I guess there's that.

"We have to be down the middle as best we can. We have licenses. We are a public trust."

This was Moonves' response to a question about whether CBS would begin moving into advocacy journalism with the cable-news success of MSNBC and Fox News. As a network, we have a responsibility to play everything down the middle, Moonves said. It's certainly not a surprising response, though it is yet another affirmation of the dominance of Jay Rosen's "view from nowhere" in the mainstream American political press.

Similar posts: Diflucan No Rx. Buy Lipitor No Prescription. Bactrim Cost. Retin A samples. Order Synthroid no prescription. Discount Lipitor.
Trackbacks from: Armour Price. Armour Price. Armour Price. Purchase Armour. Buy Armour without a prescription. Armour photos.

[This review was originally posted at the Nieman Journalism Lab Order Retin A, on July 9, 2010.]

Time's non-pay paywall: Thanks to some collaborative online sleuthing — OK, basically just wandering around on a website and asking some simple questions — we found out that Time magazine is planning an online paywall. Reuters' Felix Salmon ran into the wall first a few weeks ago, but saw that it had disappeared by the next day. Then on Tuesday, the Lab's Josh Benton noticed it again, pointing out that this was an odd kind of paywall — one without any sort of way to pay online ("a paywall without a door, Buy Retin A without a prescription, " in his words).

All Things Digital's Peter Kafka got word the next day that the paywall is part of a company-wide strategy at Time Inc. to separate its print and iPad content from its online material. The Lab found out that Time does indeed have a plan to give that paywall a door and provide a way to purchase articles online, and The New York Times reported that this non-pay wall is part of a gradual effort to retrain readers to pay for content online and noted that not everything from the magazine is gone from the website, Order Retin A.

PaidContent's Staci Kramer called the move not a paywall, but "the magazine equivalent of a condom" — a way to separate online readers from its print content. She noted that the move limits non-print access to Time to a very select group of people — namely, iPad owners. Essentially, Retin A price, it's a hardware requirement to read Time magazine, something Publish2's Scott Karp asked whether we're going to start to seeing more of.

All Things Digital's Kafka wondered why Time wouldn't just offer its print articles for free if the magazine's print and online audiences were as separate as they're typically said to be. New York's Chris Rovsar posited that the new wall is about protecting its $4.99 iPad app: If all your print stuff is available through the iPad browser for free, why buy the app. DailyFinance media critic Jeff Bercovici made the same point Order Retin A, and argued that while Time may appear forward-thinking here, this move is really a regression. Generic Retin A, Newsweek's Mark Coatney, a former Time staffer, was ruthless in his assessment of the strategy, saying that it all comes back to value, and Time hasn't articulated why it's print content is worth paying for, but its online stuff isn't.

—

Pay vs, online buying Retin A. free in Britain: Time was far from the only paywall news this past week: Three relatively small Gannett papers put up a $9.95-a-month paywall last Thursday, and the most important new paywall may have been at The Times of London and The Sunday Times, two of Britain's oldest and most respected publications, which began charging for everything on their site last Friday. That development is particularly important because it's the first move in the paid-content crusade that Rupert Murdoch has been gearing up for since last summer.

Steve Outing and Poynter's Bill Mitchell noted that the Times' paywall is among the most impenetrable we've seen yet in newspapers: All non-subscribers can see is the homepage, and even the headlines are blocked from online news aggregators, Order Retin A. Order Retin A online overnight delivery no prescription, New York's Chris Rovsar took stock of what The New York Times (planning its own paid-content system next year) could learn from how the Times rolled out its paywall, and basically, it boils down to, "Whatever they did, just don't do it." He and the Press Gazette's Dominic Ponsford ripped the Times' paid-content strategy, criticizing it for not being RSS-compatible, not linking, where can i buy cheapest Retin A online, and giving away desperate-looking freebies. (Rovsar and Ponsford do acknowledge that the site is cheap and pretty, respectively.) British journalist Kevin Anderson used the Times' paywall as an opportunity to light into the thinking that leads newspapers to charge for content online in the first place.

Meanwhile, the Guardian, Retin A coupon, another prominent British paper which is staunchly in favor of free online content, released a Wordpress plugin that allows blogs and websites to embed the full text of Guardian stories for free. (Steve Outing demonstrated with a post on the iPad.) It's an unprecedented move, and one that made for a pretty easy contrast with the Times' protectionist strategy online. Outing did it most explicitly in two posts Order Retin A, , arguing that the Guardian's strategy taps into a worldwide revenue potential, while the Times relies on its brand-loyal British readers. Murdoch "apparently still doesn’t understand that this whole pay-for-news-online thing is not about the needs of publishers like him. It’s about what the audience for news is willing to do and willing to pay for," he wrote.

—

Learning from (and fighting with) content farms: Since acquiring the online content provider Associated Content in May, Retin A pictures, Yahoo has become the latest online media company to begin producing articles based on a calculation of search terms, including for its new news blog, The Upshot. The Wrap's Dylan Stableford took a look at these "content farms," focusing on why journalists hate them and what news organizations might be able to learn from them. Buy no prescription Retin A online, (On the latter point, Stableford's sources said content farms' acute attentiveness to what people are interested in reading could be particularly instructive.)

One of the people Stableford quotes, NYU professor Jay Rosen, gets some extended time on the subject, and another, Jason Fry, posted some additional thoughts, Retin A without a prescription, too. Fry, who is quoted in the article as saying, "If you want to know how our profession ends, look at Demand Media," clarified his stance a bit, saying that what bugs him is not the low pay, but the lack of quality, Order Retin A. Still, he acknowledged that because of cost-cutting, many small- and medium-sized newspapers' content is just as mediocre. Peter Berger, Japan, craiglist, ebay, overseas, paypal, a CEO of Suite101.com, one of those content generators, said the concern from news organizations is a red herring, and his industry really presents the biggest threat to non-fiction books.

Canadian writer Liz Metcalfe voiced some similar thoughts, arguing that the problem with the "demand content" model isn't the model itself, but the poor quality of what gets produced. Newspapers should find a way to incorporate the model while producing high-quality material, Retin A duration, and beat the content farms at their own game, she said. On the other hand, Harvard prof Ethan Zuckerman said dictating content based on search would be a bad way to run a newspaper: "You’d give up the critical ability to push topics and parts of the world that readers might not be interested in, but need to know about to be an engaged, Retin A canada, mexico, india, informed citizen."

A private group called the Internet Content Syndication Council wants to do something about these dastardly villains, and they're exploring a few options, including drafting a set of content-quality guidelines, licensing content syndicators and asking Google to tweak its search formula. CNET's Caroline McCarthy wondered Order Retin A, what a guideline or licensing system would do with bloggers.

—

Chronicling a growing shift to mobile: The Pew Internet & American Life Project released a couple of fascinating studies in the past week, the first on the future of social relations online and the second a survey of Americans' mobile use. The latter study in particular turned up a raft of interesting statistics, Retin A results, led by the finding that 59 percent of adults go online wirelessly, including 47 percent of Americans with their laptops and 40 percent with their cell phones.

Poynter's Mobile Media focused on the rise in "non-voice" uses for cell phones over the past year (Silicon Alley Insider has it in graphical form). The New York Times and Washington Post centered on the survey's finding that African-Americans, Hispanics, young people and poorer Americans are among the heaviest mobile media users, Where can i cheapest Retin A online, with the Times stating that "the image of the affluent and white cellphone owner as the prototypical mobile Web user seems to be a mistaken one."

Here at the Lab, Laura McGann seized on another tidbit from the study indicating that about a fifth of young adults have made a donation via their cell phone. She tied that finding to the public radio station WBUR's attempt to find a way to allow users to donate via an iPhone app, something Apple doesn't allow, asking how nonprofit news orgs might be able to find a way to tap into that willingness to give through their cell phones.

—

Reading roundup: Lots of really thoughtful stuff this week that's well worth your time (I assume it is, anyway — maybe your time's much more valuable than mine):

— The debate over objectivity and journalism raged on this week, fueled by the firing of CNN's Octavia Nasr over a remark she made on Twitter, Order Retin A. Many of the arguments circled around to the same ground we've covered with the Gen. McChrystal and Dave Weigel flare-ups, but I wanted to highlight three takes that stand out: Salon's Dan Gillmor on America's "technically good subservient press," Jay Rosen on "objectivity as a form of persuasion," and Mediaite's Philip Bump on a journalism of individuals.

— Many new media folks have been following the fate of the nonprofit Texas Tribune, and the Columbia Journalism Review has apretty definitive account of where they stand.

— ReadWriteWeb has a handy resource for zooming out and taking a look at the big picture — a summary of five key web trends so far at 2010's halfway point.

— Spot.Us' David Cohn takes a look at the short-lived journalism startup NewsTilt and comes away with some helpful lessons.

— Finally, Google researcher Paul Adams has a presentation on the problems with the way social media is designed that's been making its way around the web. It's a whopping 216 slides, but it's a simple yet insightful glance at what feels just a little bit wrong about our social interactions online and why.

Similar posts: Order Synthroid. Cephalexin Mg. Armour Cost. Zoloft cost. Armour cost. Flagyl schedule.
Trackbacks from: Order Retin A. Order Retin A. Order Retin A. Retin A dose. Online buy Retin A without a prescription. Japan, craiglist, ebay, overseas, paypal.