<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mark Coddington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markcoddington.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markcoddington.com</link>
	<description>Transforming journalism for a transformed society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:38:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A quick guide to the maxims of new media by Dave</title>
		<link>http://markcoddington.com/2010/01/30/a-quick-guide-to-the-maxims-of-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcoddington.com/?p=280#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>In reference to “Our readers know more than we do.”

I agree with your statement, Mark, that online news organizations can only provide the information given to them by those in the know online.  The web allows people to communicate in ways never before dreamed of and consequently has made information exchange a breeze.  But when I saw the title of this subsection, I was expecting a possible different use for the phrase, similar to “The customer is always right.”  Gone are the days when news outlets could decide what was and wasn’t news.  That right, some may say burden, has now fallen upon the readers themselves.  Publish what the readers tell you via email, wall post, etc., that they want or watch them scurry to a publication that will.  This, in my opinion, is a large portion of the reason why the news industry that used to focus on fact and getting an important story across, is now more interested in indulging readers in their guilty pleasures.  They unfortunately can either conform to the celebrity gossip that the people want to hear, or eat the proverbial dust of the publications that do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reference to “Our readers know more than we do.”</p>
<p>I agree with your statement, Mark, that online news organizations can only provide the information given to them by those in the know online.  The web allows people to communicate in ways never before dreamed of and consequently has made information exchange a breeze.  But when I saw the title of this subsection, I was expecting a possible different use for the phrase, similar to “The customer is always right.”  Gone are the days when news outlets could decide what was and wasn’t news.  That right, some may say burden, has now fallen upon the readers themselves.  Publish what the readers tell you via email, wall post, etc., that they want or watch them scurry to a publication that will.  This, in my opinion, is a large portion of the reason why the news industry that used to focus on fact and getting an important story across, is now more interested in indulging readers in their guilty pleasures.  They unfortunately can either conform to the celebrity gossip that the people want to hear, or eat the proverbial dust of the publications that do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A quick guide to the maxims of new media by Information wants to be free. So does education and learning. &#171; The Learning Share</title>
		<link>http://markcoddington.com/2010/01/30/a-quick-guide-to-the-maxims-of-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator>Information wants to be free. So does education and learning. &#171; The Learning Share</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcoddington.com/?p=280#comment-1025</guid>
		<description>[...] This much is clear. Consider the apparent crisis in print journalism, the world of blogging and the maxims of new media, and the rise of the status report and social media through Twitter, Facebook, and similar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This much is clear. Consider the apparent crisis in print journalism, the world of blogging and the maxims of new media, and the rise of the status report and social media through Twitter, Facebook, and similar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This week in media musings: The Demand Media invasion, and &#8216;objectivity&#8217; trumps transparency by This Week in Review: Google’s Buzz buzz, Demand Media’s plans, and turning relationships into revenue &#124; Mark Coddington</title>
		<link>http://markcoddington.com/2009/12/19/demand-media-invasion-objectivity-trumps-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Review: Google’s Buzz buzz, Demand Media’s plans, and turning relationships into revenue &#124; Mark Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcoddington.com/?p=237#comment-907</guid>
		<description>[...] after Wired brought the business model of online content producer Demand Media to light, the conversation about the company remains on a slow burn. We’ve been hearing lately from several Demand execs; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] after Wired brought the business model of online content producer Demand Media to light, the conversation about the company remains on a slow burn. We’ve been hearing lately from several Demand execs; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This week in media musings: Tablet madness, and ideas for Sunday talk shows by This Week in Review: The New York Times’ paywall plans, and what’s behind MediaNews’ bankruptcy &#124; Mark Coddington</title>
		<link>http://markcoddington.com/2010/01/09/tablet-madness-ideas-sunday-talk-shows/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Review: The New York Times’ paywall plans, and what’s behind MediaNews’ bankruptcy &#124; Mark Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcoddington.com/?p=273#comment-906</guid>
		<description>[...] Meanwhile, Columbia j-student Vadim Lavrusik and TechCrunch’s Paul Carr got tired of the tablet hype — Lavrusik for the print industry and Carr for tech geeks. (The Week also has a great timeline of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Meanwhile, Columbia j-student Vadim Lavrusik and TechCrunch’s Paul Carr got tired of the tablet hype — Lavrusik for the print industry and Carr for tech geeks. (The Week also has a great timeline of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This week in media musings: The Demand Media invasion, and &#8216;objectivity&#8217; trumps transparency by This Week in Review: Google&#8217;s Buzz buzz, Demand Media&#8217;s plans, and turning relationships into revenue » Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://markcoddington.com/2009/12/19/demand-media-invasion-objectivity-trumps-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Review: Google&#8217;s Buzz buzz, Demand Media&#8217;s plans, and turning relationships into revenue » Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcoddington.com/?p=237#comment-875</guid>
		<description>[...] months after Wired brought the business model of online content producer Demand Media to light, the conversation about the company remains on a slow burn. We&#8217;ve been hearing lately from several Demand [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months after Wired brought the business model of online content producer Demand Media to light, the conversation about the company remains on a slow burn. We&#8217;ve been hearing lately from several Demand [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A quick guide to the maxims of new media by Inside the Social Media Strategy of the Winter Olympic Games - www.site11.com - Deep Web News Radio</title>
		<link>http://markcoddington.com/2010/01/30/a-quick-guide-to-the-maxims-of-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside the Social Media Strategy of the Winter Olympic Games - www.site11.com - Deep Web News Radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcoddington.com/?p=280#comment-847</guid>
		<description>[...] Or as Jeff Jarvis would say, &#8220;Do what you do best and link to the rest.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Or as Jeff Jarvis would say, &#8220;Do what you do best and link to the rest.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A quick guide to the maxims of new media by Inside the Social Media Strategy of the Winter Olympic Games - www.vacau.com - Deep Web News Radio</title>
		<link>http://markcoddington.com/2010/01/30/a-quick-guide-to-the-maxims-of-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside the Social Media Strategy of the Winter Olympic Games - www.vacau.com - Deep Web News Radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcoddington.com/?p=280#comment-839</guid>
		<description>[...] Or as Jeff Jarvis would say, &#8220;Do what you do best and link to the rest.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Or as Jeff Jarvis would say, &#8220;Do what you do best and link to the rest.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A quick guide to the maxims of new media by Inside the Social Media Strategy of the Winter Olympic Games - www.webuda.com - deep web news radio</title>
		<link>http://markcoddington.com/2010/01/30/a-quick-guide-to-the-maxims-of-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside the Social Media Strategy of the Winter Olympic Games - www.webuda.com - deep web news radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcoddington.com/?p=280#comment-836</guid>
		<description>[...] Or as Jeff Jarvis would say, &#8220;Do what you do best and link to the rest.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Or as Jeff Jarvis would say, &#8220;Do what you do best and link to the rest.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A quick guide to the maxims of new media by Mark Drapeau</title>
		<link>http://markcoddington.com/2010/01/30/a-quick-guide-to-the-maxims-of-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Drapeau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcoddington.com/?p=280#comment-766</guid>
		<description>Great job with this. I knew most or all of these maxims but the background info was really terrific.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job with this. I knew most or all of these maxims but the background info was really terrific.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A quick guide to the maxims of new media by Recommended Links for February 6th &#124; Alex Gamela - Digital Media &#38; Journalism</title>
		<link>http://markcoddington.com/2010/01/30/a-quick-guide-to-the-maxims-of-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>Recommended Links for February 6th &#124; Alex Gamela - Digital Media &#38; Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markcoddington.com/?p=280#comment-764</guid>
		<description>[...] Alexandre Gamela shared A quick guide to the maxims of new media &#124; Mark Coddington. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alexandre Gamela shared A quick guide to the maxims of new media | Mark Coddington. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
