Buy Neurontin Without Prescription

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:51:46 +0000

[...] after Wired brought the business model of online content producer Demand Media to light, the conversation about the company remains on a slow burn. We’ve been hearing lately from several Demand execs; [...]

Buy Neurontin Without Prescription

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:23:28 +0000

[...] months after Wired brought the business model of online content producer Demand Media to light, the conversation about the company remains on a slow burn. We’ve been hearing lately from several Demand [...]

Buy Neurontin Without Prescription

links for 2009-12-23 — contentious.com — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:01:42 +0000

[...] This week in media musings: The Demand Media invasion, and ‘objectivity’ trumps transparency | M… "Paul Bradshaw asks: “Who owns the interview?” Steve Buttry says the reporter loses control over the interview as soon she hits the “send” guys and warns journalists not to put anything into writing that they’re not willing to see published. I largely agree with Buttry on this, though I don’t go as far as he does: The journalist was within her rights to ask Bradshaw not to publish her side of the conversation (and he obviously complied). That doesn’t mean it wasn’t an arrogant, controlling thing to do, though. [...]

Buy Neurontin Without Prescription

Mark Coddington — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:11:07 +0000

That’s a great rule of thumb, Amy: In interviews, the on-the-record, off-the-record status needs to be reciprocal. If it’s off the record for the source, it can be off the record for the journalist. But if it’s on the record for the source, it’s got to be on the record for the journalist.

Buy Neurontin Without Prescription

Amy Gahran — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:15:50 +0000

RE: who owns the right to publish an interview:

Over two years ago I posted to my blog my policy that I’d only do interviews that are on the record for both participants:

http://www.contentious.com/2007/08/20/interviewing-a-blogger-youre-both-on-the-record/

The irony is, the bigger the news org, the less open they are to this kind of transparency. Which says a lot about the hypocrisy of big journalism.

- Amy Gahran

Buy Neurontin Without Prescription

Michael Josefowicz — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:13:29 +0000

I think the notion of “objectivity” emerged as newspapers moved into the mass market as a way not to offend potential advertisers.

The irony is that the value of the journalist on the ground is to bring a clear point of view. Exactly the attraction of columnists who are the draws to a newspaper.

“Objectivity” and most recently “comity of the Senate” invoked by McCain against Franken is most often just a cover to keep the public discourse from being truly engaging.

Consider the recent success of MSNBC with a clear “bias.” I think it would be useful to replace “objectivity” with authentic voice.

Transparency tends to lead to emperor’s without clothes. In my opinion, that fact, not the venality of the actors, is what makes it so terribly hard to achieve.