Buy Lioresal Without Prescription http://markcoddington.com/2009/09/08/this-week-in-media-musings-dividing-and-conquering-and-two-news-models/ Transforming journalism for a transformed society Thu, 26 May 2011 18:42:58 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 Buy Lioresal Without Prescription http://markcoddington.com/2009/09/08/this-week-in-media-musings-dividing-and-conquering-and-two-news-models/comment-page-1/#comment-17 more news business models « Business Models « Innovation Leadership Network Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:20:50 +0000 http://markcoddington.com/?p=73#comment-17 [...] a related note, Mark Coddington is compiling an extremely useful set of annotated blog posts that address these issues from the journalism [...] [...] a related note, Mark Coddington is compiling an extremely useful set of annotated blog posts that address these issues from the journalism [...]

]]> Buy Lioresal Without Prescription http://markcoddington.com/2009/09/08/this-week-in-media-musings-dividing-and-conquering-and-two-news-models/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Mark Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:21:57 +0000 http://markcoddington.com/?p=73#comment-6 That's an interesting idea, Matt. If we're taking the idea of "original sin" closer to literally, I think you're right, in the sense that that psychological turn you speak of is much more fundamental (and therefore more "original") than the ones these guys are talking about. But I'm not sure it necessarily follows that since people became less interested in news not directly related to themselves, then that disinterest must have caused newspapers to fail. Newspapers still could have succeeded in an environment in which no one cares about news they're not at the center of or can't control; they just would have had to adjust drastically to do so. So I guess we may be thinking about two different problems: I'm thinking more narrowly about what newspapers did (or failed to do) to remain relevant within 21st-century society. You seem to be looking at a deeper problem--what changed about 21st-century society that made it difficult for newspapers to adjust. So yes, your idea is an answer to a more fundamental problem than what I was looking at. Not that there's anything wrong with that--now I just need to take a step deeper and consider that, too! That’s an interesting idea, Matt. If we’re taking the idea of “original sin” closer to literally, I think you’re right, in the sense that that psychological turn you speak of is much more fundamental (and therefore more “original”) than the ones these guys are talking about. But I’m not sure it necessarily follows that since people became less interested in news not directly related to themselves, then that disinterest must have caused newspapers to fail. Newspapers still could have succeeded in an environment in which no one cares about news they’re not at the center of or can’t control; they just would have had to adjust drastically to do so.

So I guess we may be thinking about two different problems: I’m thinking more narrowly about what newspapers did (or failed to do) to remain relevant within 21st-century society. You seem to be looking at a deeper problem–what changed about 21st-century society that made it difficult for newspapers to adjust. So yes, your idea is an answer to a more fundamental problem than what I was looking at. Not that there’s anything wrong with that–now I just need to take a step deeper and consider that, too!

]]> Buy Lioresal Without Prescription http://markcoddington.com/2009/09/08/this-week-in-media-musings-dividing-and-conquering-and-two-news-models/comment-page-1/#comment-5 Matt Ostercamp Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:25:18 +0000 http://markcoddington.com/?p=73#comment-5 Thanks Mark - this was interesting and I looking forward to more. I'm wondering if the "original sin" was something outside of publishing. Just finished reading David Wells and wonder if the psychological turn of the 20th Century (the rush to embrace self actualization as the goal of life) undermined in important ways our interest in news that was not primarily about us and at some level controlled by us. - Just thinking out loud. Keep up the good work. Thanks Mark – this was interesting and I looking forward to more.

I’m wondering if the “original sin” was something outside of publishing. Just finished reading David Wells and wonder if the psychological turn of the 20th Century (the rush to embrace self actualization as the goal of life) undermined in important ways our interest in news that was not primarily about us and at some level controlled by us. – Just thinking out loud. Keep up the good work.

]]>